Power-PRO 2
powered ambulance cot
Emergency Care
Proven customer satisfaction
EMS personnel face a myriad of challenges on the job every day. One in four EMS workers will suffer a career-ending back injury within their first four years in the field.1 The number one cause - lifting. The Powered System helps you and your team respond confidently and safely - improving overall staff satisfaction.
We surveyed 1,0702-8 Power-PRO and Power-LOAD product users across 39 states nationwide.
98% agree that Stryker's Powered System has made their job easier.2-8
86% agree Stryker's Powered System has improved satisfaction.2-8
74% agree they are more likely to work at a service with Stryker's Powered System.2-8
Smart Equipment Management
The industry's first connected ambulance cot
Automatically track cot health and remotely manage your fleet through one convenient, interactive dashboard.
Maximize your investment
- Extend the life of your equipment by evaluating cot usage and rotating your fleet
- Identify training opportunities using detailed analytics to help improve patient and medic safety
- Take the guesswork out of battery replacement by monitoring use over time
Minimize downtime
- Keep your fleet ready to respond by identifying which cots need attention
- Save time and budget by troubleshooting the issue before on-site repair
- Quickly get your equipment back in the field with direct access to ProCare Services
Manage your fleet
- Start your shift right with battery status updates and other critical cot insights
- Pinpoint your fleet in near real-time with last-known location*
- Streamline reporting and planning requirements with instant access to vital equipment metrics
*Receive location updates when connected to an active Wi-Fi network and inductive charger from Power-LOAD or Performance-LOAD. Hot spot required for off-network use (not provided by Stryker). Frequency of updates depends on your connection.
Connect with an expert
Have feedback about Stryker’s products and services? Visit our product experience page to connect with us.
Thanks!
M0000014366 REV AA
1. Sanders, Mick J. (2011) Mosby’s Paramedic Textbook (4th ed., p. 36)
2. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Michigan via survey in 2018. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
3. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Ohio via survey in 2018. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
4. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Georgia via survey in 2018. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
5. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across North Carolina and South Carolina via survey in 2018. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
6. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Florida via survey in 2018. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
7. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Del-aware, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, Nevada, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Massachusetts, Kansas, Colorado, and Pennsylvania via survey in 2019. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
8. Statistics and statements gathered from employees of several different EMS services across Nevada, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Rhode Island, Florida, New Jersey, and Massachusetts via survey in 2016. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the survey respondents. Percentages include “Strongly Agree” and “Agree” responses combined and are rounded to the nearest whole percentage.
M0000003898 REV AA