Customer Updates: Stryker Network Disruption > Read Now
Written by: James Lynch, Advanced Practice Provider, Pain Consultants of San Diego
Publish date: March 2, 2026
Imaging review, a key aspect of mild® patient candidate identification, is often not included in initial schooling. To help APPs learn the basics of image review, become more familiar with identifying anatomical landmarks, and understand how to confirm if a patient is a candidate for the mild® procedure, we asked James Lynch—an APP with the Pain Consultants of San Diego—to walk us through his tips and techniques for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) review. In the following article, he shares pearls for becoming confident in imaging review and provides a series of videos with step-by-step approach he uses to determine if his patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) should make the move to mild®.
As an APP in an Interventional Pain Medicine practice that offers the mild® procedure, reviewing MRI images to determine the presence of hypertrophic ligamentum flavum (HLF) is a critical aspect of my role. Prior to joining this practice, I had very little experience reviewing MRI images. It was not part of the core curriculum while training to become an APP, and it was not an area that I felt very confident in. I’ve become more familiar and proficient with imaging review; however, I can say that it’s much more straightforward than it may initially seem. Through hands-on experience, by sharing clinical pearls among peers, and by watching step-by-step videos like those included in this article, I became competent, comfortable, and confident performing image reviews to identify mild® patient candidates.
Why is imaging review important?
We know that up to 85% of spinal canal narrowing is caused by thickened ligament.1 When we see patients with symptomatic LSS, if HLF is present, we will likely advance to mild® to provide patients long-term* relief using a therapy that has a safety profile similar to an epidural steroid injection (ESI).2 Being able to review a basic MRI empowers me to identify patients who may benefit from the mild® procedure and confidently present my recommendations to them. This confidence helps build trust between me and my patients, and makes them feel more comfortable and assured prior to scheduling their mild® procedure. Having more patients move to mild® means that I’m giving my patients a chance to achieve clinically meaningful, statistically significant improvements in mobility, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and pain reduction on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).2 It’s also incredibly rewarding to hear patients tell me about what they’re able to do now that they can walk further and do more activities than they could before.
*88% of mild® patients avoided back surgery for at least 5 years while experiencing significant symptom relief.3
MRI imaging review with mild® in mind: James Lynch's step-by-step approach
Getting Started: Reviewing the MRI Report
Step 1: Linking the Sagittal and Axial Views
Step 2: Identifying Anatomical Landmarks
Step 3: Measuring the Ligamentum Flavum
Watch the video for a full description.
LSS can be suspected by the signs and symptoms patients commonly exhibit, including pain, numbness, or heaviness when standing or walking,4 and finding relief by sitting, bending forward, or sleeping curled in the fetal position. When we see these signs in our patients, we’ll order an MRI to confirm the diagnosis and determine whether the patient is a good candidate for the mild® procedure.
When we request an MRI, we’ll get a report and the imaging back for that patient. During my review of the report, I look line-by-line, specifically confirming whether the report notes central canal stenosis. It is also helpful to make note of other contributors to central canal stenosis (such as enlarged facets, disc bulge, etc.) in order to properly prepare a patient for potential follow-up expectations.
In an axial view, I choose a slice showing the thickest representation of the ligament. I find the mid-lamina point (between the base of the spinous process and the facet edge). I then measure from the posterior lamina edge to the thecal sac, confirming if the patient has hypertrophic ligamentum flavum ≥ 2.5mm.
I find it helpful to review, practice reviewing the MRI first and report second to confirm their diagnoses.
In the example shown here, I would note the following:
Sometimes I will request that the radiology report includes a measurement of the HLF, which makes it easier to review.
Because I have confirmed the presence of central canal stenosis in the report, I’ll then review the imaging to determine whether the patient is a candidate for the mild® procedure.* I have also taken the reverse approach and reviewed the imaging first, and then used the radiology report as a confirmation of my own findings.
*Please see IFU for full indications/contraindications
Watch the video for a full description.
In pulling up the images, I typically begin setting up the images to facilitate a clear and efficient review process. Begin by adjusting the layout of the software to show 2 images at the same time.
On the left-hand side, we will show the sagittal view, or vertical cross-section of the patient. On the right-hand side, the axial view, or horizontal cross-section of the patient, will be displayed.
I will press the “Link” command in the system software to correlate the images together and select the STIR images (T2 weighted images).
The reason I use the T2 image is because the cerebral spinal fluid brightens up, making it a lot easier to assess the spinal canal.
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
My specific area of interest in evaluating the mild® patient candidate is the small black area, which is the ligamentum flavum, highlighted in the image here.
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
In the small white area, we can see the central canal where the nerves are housed. In this image, we can see that the canal is very small, with very little white showing. This is consistent with central canal stenosis, and in this case, we can see clearly that the hypertrophic ligamentum flavum is compressing the nerves.
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
By moving our image up to L2-L3, we can see an excellent comparison of the healthy central canal. The large white area shows that at this level, the thin black ligament is not compressing the nerves.
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
In the sagittal view, it's possible to see clearly where the spinal canal narrows, and this is helpful in identifying all levels where the central canal is stenosed.
We can also see here that the patient has a disc bulge, indicative of multi-factorial central canal stenosis.
It’s important to remember that comorbidities are common among LSS patients—in fact, a Level-1 clinical study of mild® patients demonstrated that just 5% of patients presented with central canal stenosis only. The presence of comorbidities, such as foraminal narrowing, lateral recess narrowing, or facet hypertrophy DO NOT RULE OUT patients as mild® procedure candidates. Indeed, the same clinical study found that the majority of patients with comorbidities achieved an ODI improvement of ≥10 points at 2-year follow-up.2
Watch the video for a full description.
Using the length tool in the software, I can draw a line across the ligament (the dark area indicated in the image below) to obtain the ligament measurement.
Photo Courtesy of James Lynch, PA – L3/L4 interspace
Here, the measurement clearly shows an HLF of 6.38 mm. I will then repeat this measurement process at each of the levels that are affected by central stenosis (per the report, and as seen in the sagittal view).
As a reminder, any patients with HLF ≥2.5 mm may be considered a candidate for the mild® procedure.4,5
Imaging Review
Using the length tool in the software, I can draw a line across the ligament (the dark area indicated in the image below) to obtain the ligament measurement.
*88% of mild patients avoided back surgery for at least 5 years while experiencing significant symptom relief.3
An ideal mild® procedure candidate
Watch the video for a full description.
In this video, we present an end-to-end example of the imaging review for an ideal mild® case. In under 5 minutes, I can:
What if MRI isn’t an option?
When a patient can’t have an MRI, we will instead send them in for a computed tomography (CT), ideally with a myelogram. A myelogram will highlight these relevant anatomical structures, so the ligament can be seen and determine the patient’s candidacy. Even if a myelogram is not an option, I try to indicate a primary diagnosis for lumbar stenosis when I order the CT, and the radiologist will then assess that patient for lumbar stenosis and HLF.
Using imaging to support patient education
When patients are in the office, I’ll often bring my laptop into the exam room and show them their imaging on screen. Being able to see their own anatomy, and specifically the hypertrophic ligament pressing on the nerves, is incredibly helpful to demonstrate this root cause of their LSS.
Then, I can also use the imaging to clearly point out how mild® addresses a major root cause of LSS by removing excess ligament tissue and leaving no implants behind. I’ll also show them where the nerves are being compressed and educate them about how mild® restores space in the spinal canal, which reduces the compression of the nerves. Most patients understand how the mild® procedure works much more easily when they can see the images themselves, and it also helps them realize how the mild® procedure can provide long-term relief and restore mobility.
How I Embrace Imagining: Don’t be intimidated—practice makes perfect!
When I first started with imaging review, I was much less comfortable and confident than I am today. Knowing that our practice is committed to helping more patients move to mild®, I recognized that becoming comfortable with imaging review was a critical aspect of my role. Even though MRI review was not something included in my initial APP education, I realized that becoming proficient gave me an opportunity to bring additional value to our patients and practice.
The best way I found to get comfortable with imaging review was to dive in and review previous cases so I could become familiar with the anatomy and structures. Beyond hands-on experience, there are resources that offer additional support, including:
Comfortability reviewing imaging came with additional practice and experience. Over time I noticed how many of my patients with LSS have HLF and were candidates for the mild® procedure. By putting more patients on the path to lasting relief with mild®, I got to see first-hand how regaining mobility can be a life-changing improvement for the patients in my care.
About James Lynch, PA
James Lynch is an Advanced Practice Provider who works as a Physician Assistant (PA) at Pain Consultants of San Diego, a leading pain management practice in Southern California. At the time of publishing, James Lynch was a paid APP Consultant for Vertos Medical, now a part of Stryker.
The opinions of James Lynch, PA stated throughout are those of the James Lynch, PA and may not necessarily be those of Stryker.
If you would like a mild® Quick Reference Card for your office or to learn more about APP-specific educational opportunities, please contact your local sales representative.
mild® patient education video
IVS-MILD-SYK-2675596_REV-0