Mako SmartRoboticsTM
The next generation of Mako isn’t just about what it does. It’s about who it serves. Let us show you all the possibilities.
These products are not available for purchase by the general public.
Always follow the directions for use.
Mako SmartRobotics™
SmartRobotics combines 3D CT-based planning and AccuStop™ haptic technology.1
?$max_width_1440$ "Mako 4 System with Mako Total Knee software and the Q Guidance System")
Introducing the latest advancements in SmartRobotics™
More Mako applications in a single system
Mako Total Knee
Mako Total Hip
Mako Partial Knee
More Mako innovation with Mako 4
Mako 4
The latest advancement in SmartRobotics™ is here. Our fourth generation Mako System is a single system that delivers more Mako capabilities and applications.
Integrated with Stryker's Q Guidance System
Mako 4 integrates Stryker’s Q Guidance System which is built on over 20 years of experience developing guidance technologies.
Q Guidance System display monitors
Large display monitor for intraoperative visibility.
FP8000 camera
Our proprietary FP8000 camera features a wide field of view for probe and array visibility.
Small OR footprint
Space-efficient design with a compact footprint for transport, setup and turnover.
More Mako integrated technologies
MICS 3
Built on the legacy of Stryker’s System 9 power tools, the MICS 3 handpiece, attachments, and blades are designed for your Mako procedures.
Contact a Stryker representative to see Mako SmartRobotics™ in action!
Thank you for contacting us. A Stryker representative will be in touch with you shortly.
Thank you for contacting us. A Stryker representative will be in touch shortly.
References:
- Stryker data on file.
- Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. The Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100-B:930-7.
- Kleeblad LJ, Borus T, Coon T, Dounchis J, Nguyen J, Pearle A. Midterm survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-arm assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018:1-8.
- Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2496-2501. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.042
- Hozack WJ. Multicentre analysis of outcomes after robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J:Orthop Proc. 2018;100-B(Supp_12):38.
- Domb B, Redmond J, Louis S, Alden K, Daley R, LaReau J, et al. Accuracy of component positioning in 1980 total hip arthroplasties: a comparative analysis by surgical technique and mode of guidance. The Journal of Arthoplasty. 30(2015)2208-2218.
- Domb BG, El Bitar YF, Sadik AY, Stake CE, Botser IB. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):329-336. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3253-7
- Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(8): 627-635. doi:10.2106/JBJS.15.00664
- Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1
- Hampp EL, Scholl L, Faizan A, Sodhi N, Mont MA, Westrich G. Comparison of Iatrogenic Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Partial Knee Arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2021 Aug 5]. Surg Technol Int. 2021;39:sti39/1465. doi:10.52198/21.STI.39.OS1465
- Catani F., Zambianchi F., Marcovigi A., Franceschi G., Nardacchione R. Component positioning and soft-tissue tensioning influence clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a short-term follow-up study. Orthopaedic Proceedings Vol. 100-B, No. SUPP_12. Accessed online at https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.2018.12.003
JR-GSNPS-SYK-1643187